Journal of Social Solutions
Journal of Social Solutions

For authors and reviewers

Instructions for authors

General requirements

  • Manuscripts must be original, must not have been published elsewhere, and must not be under consideration by another journal.
  • Manuscripts must be written in English; submissions in other languages are not accepted.
  • An ORCID iD is required for all authors at submission.

Article types

  • Original research article: up to 8,000 words (excluding references, tables, and figures).
  • Review article: critical synthesis of the literature, up to 10,000 words.
  • Letter to the Editor: commentary on articles published in the journal or on current issues in the field, up to 1,500 words.

Manuscript preparation

The initial submission may be made in your own format, provided the main file is editable (DOCX or LaTeX); PDF-only submissions cannot be processed. Once the manuscript is returned for revision or accepted, the revised version must be prepared using the journal's article template: download the article template (DOCX).

  • Abstract of 130–150 words, followed by 3–5 keywords.
  • Number all headings; cite every table and figure in the text.
  • Prepare a separate anonymized version for double-blind review.

References — APA style

References must follow the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 7th edition. In-text citations use the author–date format, e.g. (Yılmaz, 2024) or (Demir & Kaya, 2023, p. 15). Include a DOI for every source that has one. Examples:

  • Journal article: Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (2024). Title of the article. Journal Name, 12(3), 45–67. https://doi.org/xx.xxxx/xxxx
  • Book: Author, C. C. (2022). Title of the book (2nd ed.). Publisher.
  • Chapter: Author, D. D. (2023). Chapter title. In E. E. Editor (Ed.), Book title (pp. 101–120). Publisher.

For how to submit, see E-submission.

Research and publication ethics

Journal of Social Solutions follows the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) at every stage of the publication process. The principles below are binding for authors, reviewers, and editors alike.

Research integrity

Fabrication, falsification, or selective reporting of data is a serious ethical violation and results in rejection or, if discovered after publication, retraction.

Plagiarism

All submissions are screened with similarity-detection software before review. Text, ideas, or findings of others must be properly attributed; this includes self-citation of the author's own earlier work.

Authorship

Only individuals who have made a substantial scholarly contribution should be listed as authors, and all authors must approve the final manuscript. Disputes over author order must be resolved before submission.

Ethics approval

Research involving human participants requires approval from an institutional ethics committee; the approval number and date must be stated in the manuscript. Informed consent must be obtained from all participants.

Conflicts of interest

Authors, reviewers, and editors must disclose any financial or personal relationships that could influence the evaluation of the work. Editors and reviewers with a conflict withdraw from the process.

Use of artificial intelligence

Generative AI tools may not be listed as authors. Any use of AI tools in the preparation of a manuscript must be transparently described in the methods or acknowledgements section.

Corrections and retractions

Errors and ethical breaches found after publication are handled under the journal's published updates policy; see Publication updates and corrections.

To raise an ethical concern, contact the editorial office at contact@mjournals.org. All reports are handled confidentially.

Publication updates and corrections

The version of an article published in Journal of Social Solutions is the version of record. Once an article has appeared in an issue it is not silently altered, replaced or removed. Any change that affects the scholarly content is made through one of the published notices below, and every notice is linked to the article it concerns.

Correction (erratum and corrigendum)

A correction is issued when part of an article is wrong or misleading but the findings and conclusions still stand. An erratum covers errors introduced by the journal during production; a corrigendum covers errors made by the authors. Typical cases are a mislabelled figure, an incorrect value in a table, a missing funding or ethics statement, or a wrong author name or affiliation.

Corrections are published as separate, citable items and linked from the original article in both directions. Minor typographical changes that do not affect meaning are made without a notice.

Expression of concern

An expression of concern is published when the editors have well-founded doubts about an article but the investigation is not yet complete, or when an investigation cannot be concluded — for example because an institution does not respond. It is a temporary notice and is replaced by a correction, a retraction, or a statement of resolution once the matter is settled.

Retraction

An article is retracted when its main findings are unreliable or when a serious ethical breach is established. Grounds for retraction include fabricated or falsified data, plagiarism, duplicate publication, undisclosed conflicts of interest that materially affect the work, unethical research, and honest error substantial enough to invalidate the conclusions.

Retraction is not a punishment. It is a correction of the scholarly record, and the notice states plainly what was wrong, who requested the retraction, and whether the authors agree.

What happens to a retracted article

The article is not deleted. It remains online so that anyone who has cited or downloaded it can still see what was published. The following applies:

  • the article page and the PDF are clearly marked as retracted;
  • the retraction notice is free to read and is linked from the article;
  • the article keeps its identifier, so existing citations continue to resolve;
  • the article is removed from the journal's list of published research and is not counted in journal metrics.

Complete removal is reserved for the rare cases where leaving the article online would be unlawful, would violate a court order, or would present a serious risk to health or to an identifiable person. In those cases the metadata and a notice remain in place.

Reporting a problem with a published article

Anyone may raise a concern — readers, reviewers, authors and institutions alike. Write to the editorial office with the article title, what you believe is wrong, and any supporting material. Concerns raised anonymously are considered on their merits.

The editors first ask the corresponding author for an explanation, and normally allow two weeks for a reply. Where necessary the authors' institution is contacted. Cases are handled following the flowcharts of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). The people who raise a concern are kept informed of the outcome, and their identity is not disclosed to the authors without their consent.

Contact details are on the Contact us page.

Authorship changes after publication

Adding, removing or reordering authors after publication requires a written request signed by all authors, including the person being added or removed, together with the reason for the change. Approved changes are published as a corrigendum.

Editorial policy

All submissions to Journal of Social Solutions undergo double-blind peer review: the identities of authors and reviewers are mutually concealed throughout the process.

  1. Initial screening (≈1 week): the editor checks scope fit and formal requirements.
  2. Reviewer assignment: at least two independent experts are appointed.
  3. Review (≈4–6 weeks): originality, methodology, coherence of findings, and contribution are assessed.
  4. Decision: accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject, based on the reviewers' reports.
  5. Production: accepted articles are copy-edited, typeset, and published with a DOI.

The average time to first decision is 6–8 weeks. Authors may appeal an editorial decision once, with a reasoned letter to the editorial office; the editor's decision following an appeal is final.

For reviewers

Reviewers safeguard the scholarly quality of Journal of Social Solutions. Reviewers are expected to:

  • provide objective, constructive, and timely evaluations;
  • keep all information about the manuscript strictly confidential;
  • not use the content of a manuscript under review for personal advantage;
  • decline the assignment when a conflict of interest exists;
  • point out relevant published work that is not cited, and flag suspected plagiarism or data problems to the editor.

Reviewers are invited by the editorial office. The invitation e-mail contains everything needed to access the manuscript and submit the review.

E-submission

Please send your manuscript, prepared with the journal template, to contact@mjournals.org. Include the title page and the ORCID iD of every author. An online submission system is being prepared and will be announced on this page.

Checklist

Before submitting, please confirm that:

  • the manuscript has not been published and is not under review elsewhere;
  • the main manuscript file is editable (DOCX or LaTeX), not PDF only — the article template becomes mandatory at the revision stage;
  • title page, abstract (130–150 words), and 3–5 keywords are included;
  • an anonymized version is provided for double-blind review;
  • references follow APA 7 and include DOIs where available;
  • all tables and figures are cited in the text;
  • ethics approval information is stated (if applicable);
  • all authors' ORCID iDs are provided;
  • a conflict of interest statement is included in the manuscript;
  • the corresponding author accepts the CC BY 4.0 licensing terms on behalf of all authors when completing the submission.

Conflict of interest

Authors must disclose any financial support, employment, consultancy or personal relationship that could be seen to influence the work submitted to Journal of Social Solutions. Where there is nothing to disclose, this should be stated explicitly.

The declaration is made electronically during submission, by the corresponding author on behalf of all co-authors, and is repeated in the manuscript itself. There is no separate form to complete, sign or upload.

Article processing charge

Journal of Social Solutions does not charge any fee at any stage of the publication process. There is no submission fee, no page charge, and no article processing charge; all publication costs are covered by the publisher.